Difference between ASP.NET MVC vs ASP.Net Core programmatically

Difference between ASP.NET MVC vs ASP.Net Core programmatically 

• Middleware: In ASP.NET Core, middleware is used to process requests and responses, while in ASP.NET MVC, filters are used for this purpose.
• Configuration: ASP.NET Core uses a different configuration system than ASP.NET MVC, which is based on the Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration library. This allows developers to configure their applications using a variety of configuration sources such as JSON, XML, and environment variables.
• Dependency Injection: ASP.NET Core has a built-in dependency injection container that allows developers to manage dependencies in their applications easily, while ASP.NET MVC does not have this feature built-in.
• Razor Pages: ASP.NET Core introduced Razor Pages, which is a simpler way to create dynamic web pages that require less code than traditional MVC. Razor Pages also makes it easier to test and maintain applications.
• Cross-platform Development: ASP.NET Core is designed to be cross-platform and can run on Linux, Windows, and macOS, while ASP.NET MVC only runs on Windows.
• .NET Standard: ASP.NET Core targets .NET Standard, which means that it can be used with other .NET implementations, while ASP.NET MVC is based on the full .NET Framework.
• Performance: ASP.NET Core has been optimized for performance and is faster than ASP.NET MVC.

In summary, ASP.NET Core provides a more modern and flexible framework for developing web applications than ASP.NET MVC, with built-in features such as middleware, dependency injection, and Razor Pages. Additionally, it is designed to be cross-platform and is more performant than ASP.NET MVC.